No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

Yes, it is well known that throughout history the female gender has always had a history of abuse against them, therefore I would say that we men must be aware that women are our life companions and without them, life too. It would be difficult, that's why we have two genders to support each other. I would say that in cases where the commanders want to take advantage of a female recruit, they should have a safe position where they can report them and also make them pay for their actions. In Colombia there is a police help center. For first instance crimes against women, this is in an environment where women are comfortable and are somewhat afraid to speak.

That sounds like an issue for men. Women shouldn't have to avoid certain jobs or places in order to not be sexually assaulted.

If that woman know how to combat and defend her self she should be able to defend herself from suxal assault position PLUS sexual assult should not even be allow in first place

In high-risk combat situations the men do not think about the women with them as women, they see them as their fellow soldiers. Also by the time a platoon gets to the point in their train that they are going into combat together, everyone has spent so much time together that the men see the women as either one of the boys or their sister.

Yes, women should be allowed to serve in combat roles. While it may be true that women have a high risk for sexual assault, men should have the common sense not to do such thing, especially if it is one of your fellow soldiers.

Unfortunately, the services aren't likely to use their sexual assault data to make the case that injecting women into hard-charging, all-male