Environmental regulations should only be put in place if they actually have a meaningful effect on the problem they intend to solve. I have yet to see any environmental regulation proposals concerning climate change - in the U.S. or anywhere else - that do anything other than destroy economies for no meaningful benefit if accepting current climate models of NOAA or IPCC. Further, China is a large elephant in the room, an authoritarian state that does as it pleases, including burning coal to meet its energy needs. International "agreements" have no effect on China.
Be the first to reply to this answer.