While I understand the distinction you're making between the violinist analogy and pregnancy, it's important to emphasize that consent to sex isn't necessarily consent to pregnancy. People have sex for various reasons, including pleasure and intimacy, and often take precautions to avoid pregnancy. Despite these precautions, unintended pregnancies still occur. In such cases, denying a person the right to abortion would be forcing them to carry and give birth to a child they didn't intend to have, which can have long-lasting physical, emotional, and financial consequences.

Regarding your description of abortion procedures, it's important to note that the majority of abortions take place in the first trimester, when the fetus is still in the early developmental stages. The methods used in these early-stage abortions are not as you described. For example, medication abortion involves taking pills that induce a miscarriage, similar to a natural miscarriage. Surgical abortions performed in the first trimester also use less invasive methods.

Moreover, later-term abortions, which are quite rare, are often performed in cases where the life or health of the pregnant person is at risk or when the fetus has severe abnormalities. In such cases, abortion can be a medically necessary and compassionate option.

Now, considering the importance of personal autonomy and the various reasons why people might seek an abortion, how do you propose we address unwanted pregnancies and the potential consequences for both the pregnant person and the resulting child?