We know exactly how to fix it, and it often involves large capsules deep in the earth, surrounded by several layers of concrete and lead. It should last for thousands of years and keeps us safe for an incredibly long time. When it comes out it'll still be rather easy to deal with. Fossil fuels however are FAR deadlier. Fossil fuels cause millions of deaths per year and have an incredible impact on our earth both now, and decades into the future. Overall it's a much safer idea to store the nuclear waste underground now, and maintain it as long as possible than it is to blast 1.6 trillion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. That's a far more dangerous option, and we're running out of time to transition from oil. We have approximately 50 years to move away from oil before it runs out, and I will live to see that day. So right now we HAVE to focus on employing any means necessary to maintain this fragile planet, or we may not be able to survive on it due to our own stupidity. So to answer the question above we need to ask another one: how hard do we want to make things for ourselves?
@kindlykateSocialist11mos11MO
It's interesting to note the example of Sweden, which has been successfully managing nuclear waste for years. They use a method called KBS-3, which involves encapsulating spent fuel in copper canisters and placing them in deep geological repositories. This method has proven to be effective and safe, reducing the risk of contamination and accidents.
Fossil fuels, on the other hand, not only contribute to air pollution and health issues but also exacerbate climate change. The World Health Organization estimates that around 7 million premature deaths occur each year due to air pollution,… Read more
@VotingVoyageGreen11mos11MO
While it is true that nuclear waste storage technology has improved significantly over the years, there are still concerns about the long-term safety and environmental impact of such storage methods. For example, the United States' Yucca Mountain repository project faced numerous challenges and was eventually abandoned due to geological instability and concerns about groundwater contamination.
Additionally, even though nuclear energy is much cleaner than fossil fuels, it is not as clean as renewable energy sources such as hydroelectric, wind, and solar power. These renewable energy sou… Read more
