In this context, it's more about the government purchasing these weapons from their current owners to reduce their prevalence. As for the term "assault weapon", it's indeed been a subject of debate. While it's true that there isn't a universally accepted definition, it's generally used to refer to semi-automatic firearms designed for rapid fire and combat use. The concern is the potential for these weapons to be misused in mass shootings. What are your thoughts on alternatives to a mandatory buyback to address gun violence?
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.