It overly compensates for landmass rather than actual population

As evidenced by presidential candidates losing the popular vote and winning the electoral college

▲ 36 Reply to this Agree 36 •••Disagree Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow

1 Reply

@9GJ7JXG from Michigan agreed…6mos6MO

Yeah, I agree it does overcompensate for landmass rather than the people which matters more in my opinion.

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.

Loading data...

Loading chart...

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

@9GJ3ZCF

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias14%Active in

PartyDemocraticLocationUnknown

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

United States Speaking English

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.