Should the government prioritize the maintenance and repair of existing roads and bridges over building new infrastructure?

No

Yes, better to fix old roads than to build new ones, but road infrastructure is often already overbuilt and some of it such as urban freeways should be converted back to rail/bike/path/land.

Yes, unless new infrastructure is required to ease transportation delays for vital goods/services.

No, as long as new infrastructure is exclusively public transportation

Prioritize rail first, then roads used by buses, then bike paths and sidewalks

No and we should abolish the DOT and privatize all roadways.

Develop new infrastructure only in places that are lacking in it like rural areas. Otherwise, focus on maintaining and rebuilding existing infrastructure

No, only after evaluations of existing infrastructure has determined a new road or bridge is necessary or the repairs would cost more than a new item.

No, because current designs are faulty and should be improved.

Yes, unless that new infrastructure is for public transport or bicycles.

Yes, the population will be shrinking in a matter of decades, investing in existing infrastructures would be the best course of action.

Yes, but we should move toward privatising infrastructure.

No, so long as the new infrastructure supports public transit rather than automobiles.

Before engaging in new taxation schemes for infrastructure, government should repair and maintain infrastructure that taxpayers have already paid for.

Before asking voters to allow the imposition of new tax schemes, government should maintain infrastructure for which citizens have already been taxed.

Yes, until existing infrastructure is brought up to standard

No, prioritization should be on a case-by-case basis

Yes, but only maintain existing roads and bridges instead of producing new roads and bridges. If new infrastructure is produced, it should be regarding mass transportation i.e. trains, metro, buses, light rail, trams, and ferries.

I think they should be moderate at doing both when needed.

Yes but only on the local level. Private contract should be used for infrastructure.

No, they should continue a hybrid effort of repairing the existent infrastructure while continuing to implement newer eco-friendly options.

Both. New infrastructure with crumbling old infrastructure is a waste of money. Infrastructure money has to be responsible spent between repair current and building new.

The government should prioritize both maintenance and repair of existing infrastructure and construction of new infrastructure, especially infrastructure that reduces car dependency

No our infrastructure needs rebuilt including power

Yes, but such decisions must be relegated to state and local governments

No, Balance the maintenance and repair of existing roads and bridges with building new infrastructure.

Cutting other social program and planned parenthood funding would allow both

Do both. The federal government literally prints its own money

NO, they both should be prioritized and dependent on the area

No, and cities should move to being more pedestrian friendly to cut down on the American reliance on cars.

there should be less spending on the military and random projects like putting a train on the moon. more on roads, infrastructure, and helping people would be the best.

There needs to be a balance between maintaining old infrastructure that is still viable to have around, versus derelict dilapidated buildings that need to be demolished, and improving the growth of transportation networks

Yes, but not at the expense of new infrastructure that would replace or reorganize those existing roads and bridges