Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.
@9NCV9NN 7hrs7H
Yes, with a discount for public transport due to the fact that working may be harder with specific disabilities
@9N7G5X43 days3D
This should already be though out during the planning process for the transportation.
@ChaseOliver 4 days4D
As long as public transportation is funded by taxpayers, which includes public-private partnerships, they must be fully accessible to all.
@ChaseOliver 4 days4D
To the degree that public transportation is funded by taxpayers, which includes public-private transit partnerships, they must be fully accessible to everyone.
@ChaseOliver 4 days4D
To the degree that govenment provides transportation services to the public - which would better be served by the private market - this publicly funded service must be accessible to all.
@RobinHoudeDemocrat 6 days6D
Yes, and provide funding to upgrade existing systems to full accessibility
@9MYFGYR6 days6D
Yes, but only when NEW infrastructure is being built, don't destroy something that works.
@9MSNM83Independent1wk1W
Yes, but within reason, additional requirements could cause public transportation systems to just not be expanded/ invested in since they are already a huge challenge in the US. Depending on the disability, it could be hard to guarantee 100% accessibility.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
