Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9N6SBJQ from California answered…19mins19m

If you love out of state and own 10 units or houses you’re an investor. You should not have rent control for non investo…

 @9N6S2YM from Maryland answered…23mins23m

I don't think builders should be compelled to include them; however, the disparity in means between investors/developers…

 @9N6RVNH from Massachusetts answered…27mins27m

New developments should be offered tax breaks and other "carrots" to beautify the land they develop.

 @9N6RHRB from Michigan answered…36mins36m

But what happens if either party wins? The Proponents have a point, but what happens to appartments in areas that are pa…

 @9N6RHRB from Michigan answered…36mins36m

Either or has it's downside, as the social programs pull more money, but the criminal offence could build up to unpayabl…

 @9N6QYCC from California answered…46mins46m

No, but there should be limits on how much a landlord can increase rent based on the previous lease agreement (no more t…

 @9N694LC from North Carolina answered…5hrs5H

I feel like they should, only if the person has an actual reason for it and try to get their payments in.

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…8hrs8H

Housing will continue to rise in price as long as restrictive zoning regulations prevent housing from being built where…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…8hrs8H

I sympathize with the need for more shelters and services for the homeless. When government subsidizes these services, i…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…8hrs8H

While the best way to end housing shortages is to build more housing, government subsidies distort the process by incent…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…9hrs9H

No, because when shelters are funded by government, however well-meaning, the incentives of shelter administrators shift…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…9hrs9H

Instead of subjecting construction to rent-seeking that would prevent housing from being built where most needed, govern…

 @9N5YZM2 from Georgia answered…9hrs9H

No, but increase funding for shelters, and increase availability of shelters (esp. in extreme conditions, e.g. severe co…

 @98XV642 from Minnesota answered…9hrs9H

Yes, and ban all noncitizens, foreign companies and investors from buying residential property

 @9N5XMF7 from Texas answered…10hrs10H

No, the government should instead pursue policies to increase the amount of housing, to reduce the cost of renting

 @9N5WBYD from Oregon answered…11hrs11H

Yes, but it would be better if public housing was invested in.

 @9N5WBYD from Oregon answered…11hrs11H

Yes, and better drug treatment infrastructure should be incentivized.

 @9N5WBYD from Oregon answered…11hrs11H

Yes, foreign enterprises have no place profiting off of American residential facilities.

 @9N5WBYD from Oregon answered…11hrs11H

Yes, and repossession of homes by financial institutions should be heavily restricted to high earners.

 @9N5WBYD from Oregon answered…11hrs11H

Yes, but it would be even better if the government built affordable high quality housing for the lower and middle class.

 @9N5W6JHfrom Washington  answered…11hrs11H

Yes. Foreign investors should be banned from the purchase of residential property.

 @9N5T5WJ from Oklahoma answered…13hrs13H

There should be locations provided within reasonable distances for camps. The mental health crisis is serious and not ev…

 @9N5S5S9 from North Carolina answered…13hrs13H

There should be designated areas they can set up an encampment. With clear no loitering signs posted at public businesse…

 @9N5RCLJ from Oregon answered…14hrs14H

This is a false premise. These people would not be in a position to camp in public spaces IF housing were a guaranteed r…

 @9N5R6CZfrom Virgin Islands  answered…14hrs14H

The states themselves should implement rent control policies and the goverment should just support this current