More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Last answered 15 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by American voters.
No, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Sep 6, 2016. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
More stances on this issue
I am tired of the sheeple thinking the government is the answer to anything. we need to grow up and do it ourself. 3 years ago from a Constitution in Strawberry, AZ
The government would not have to regulate any drug price if the insurance industry did not exist. Drug companies would be bankrupt if anyone had to pay OOP for drugs. 3 years ago from a Republican in Roscommon, MI
No but they should enforce antitrust laws to prevent pharmacies from hiking their prices with impunity. 3 years ago from a Libertarian in Mesa, AZ
Only after financial data is given to the public that supports the set price. 3 years ago from a Democrat in Columbia, MD
Only to a certain degree, the company has to make a profit to pay it's bills too but shouldn't jeopardize life for the sake of stock holders. 3 years ago from a Republican in Atlanta, GA
Yes, they should not allow companies to buy up patents and turn around and sell the drugs at ridiculous profit margins, especially drug research funded by the government. If the research is privately funded, that should not be as tightly regulated. 3 years ago from a Constitution in Bartlesville, OK
Ban drug marketing and the billions spend per year on healthcare advertising. 3 years ago from a Constitution in Gastonia, NC
Yes and the government should invest in researching new life-saving drugs. 3 years ago from a Green in Moscow, ID
Yes, but only life-saving drugs and a fair profit margin slightly higher than typical for industry should be targeted to encourage further investment in life-saving drugs. 3 years ago from a Republican in San Juan Capistrano, CA
Drug companies should be treated as monopolies. 3 years ago from a Libertarian in Carmel Valley Village, CA
Open up the market completely, so that other companies can create similar products and sell them cheaper, driving the prices down. 3 years ago from a Libertarian in Fort Collins, CO
No, but they should be able to step in if prices are out of hand. 3 years ago from a Green in Walnut Creek, CA
It is not good to have government regulate private business but put a cap on profits. a percentage above cost and kept affordable. 3 years ago from a Republican in Los Angeles, CA
The FDA is a joke and, in many ways, makes it very difficult for any competition the exist. This, and the existence of third party payments enable the sole proprietor of the pharmaceutical agent to charge essentially what he wishes. 3 years ago from a Constitution in Aurora, CO
Only if they also enforce that research be published according to the difference in rates of increase in pharmaceutical prices and the inflation rate nationally. 3 years ago from a Republican in Marysville, WA