The 14th amendment of the U.S. constitution states that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” Opponents of birth right citizenship argue that the 14th amendment is not clear since it does not specifically state that babies born to parents who were in the United States unlawfully were automatically citizens. Proponents argue that overturning the 14th amendment would increase the number of undocumented immigrants with each child born here, cost the U.S. taxpayers billions, and reduce the tax base.
53% Yes |
47% No |
35% Yes |
39% No |
12% Yes, if they were born here |
6% No, they must formally apply like every other new citizen |
3% Yes, but it should not grant their parents citizenship |
2% No, all illegal immigrants should be deported |
2% Yes, but only after performing 4 years of military service or graduating college |
|
0% Yes, and abolish all national borders |
See how support for each position on “Immigration” has changed over time for 8.6m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Immigration” has changed over time for 8.6m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@4PQN7G43yrs3Y
No! They are citizens of their parents homelands. The 14th amendment was expressly for the children of slaves. Unless the parents were legally in the US and in process of achieving permanent or citizenship status then the kids should NOT get citizenship.
@4X8J2BH3yrs3Y
I do not believe in the moral legitimacy of the concept of "Citizenship," which basically states that people are the "Property" of "their" government --- which is another word for SLAVE of "their" government.
@4R2CGJK3yrs3Y
I agree with the 14th amendment: All persons born or naturalized* in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
*Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is granted to a foreign citizen or national after he or she fulfills the requirements established by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act
@4Q4HBM93yrs3Y
if you are born in the United States of America you are a citizen
@4YS8D6Z3yrs3Y
Children of illegal immigrants should be deported with their parents. Children of illegals who are born here should be immediately placed into foster care and the parents deported.
@4RS8N5Y3yrs3Y
Once an illegal has committed a crime and gets deported for it he/she should be tattooed so that when he/she simply re-crosses the border anyone can see they are illegal and report them. We have had enough instances of repeat crimes from illegal aliens.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Immigration” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH10hrs10H
Senate Republicans on Friday unveiled a plan to require that the Department of Homeland Security receive notification of any illegal alien attempt to purchase a firearm."Those who come into America illegally should be detained and deported," Arkansas GOP Sen. Tom Cotton said in a press release. "They certainly shouldn’t be able to purchase a firearm. Our bill is necessary to ensure the proper authorities are notified when an illegal immigrant attempts to buy a gun."Under the plan, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would receive notification when an illegal alien fails a background check while attempting to purchase a firearm. It is already illegal for an illegal alien to purchase a firearm and 2022 witnessed almost 4,400 failed background checks due to the would-be purchaser's unlawful presence in the country, according to the Washington Times.
@ISIDEWITH1 day1D
In a significant move to address the challenges faced by public schools in Colorado, Governor Jared Polis has signed a bill allocating $24 million in one-time funding to support districts overwhelmed by an influx of immigrant students. This legislative action comes in response to the arrival of approximately 7,000 unexpected students between October 2023 and March 2024, a development that has put a strain on resources and underscored the need for additional support in educational institutions across the state.The funding is specifically designed to assist public school districts and charter schools that have experienced a surge in enrollment after the annual October headcount, which traditionally determines the level of state funding each district receives. By addressing this discrepancy, the bill aims to ensure that schools have the necessary resources to provide a quality education to all students, regardless of their immigration status or the timing of their enrollment.Governor Polis's decision to sign the bill into law reflects a broader commitment to education and inclusivity, emphasizing the importance of adapting to demographic changes and meeting the needs of a diverse student population. The allocation of $24 million in funding is a testament to Colorado's proactive approach to educational challenges, setting a precedent for other states grappling with similar issues.The impact of this funding is expected to be significant, enabling schools to hire additional staff, purchase educational materials, and implement programs designed to support immigrant students' integration and academic success. By taking concrete steps to address the immediate needs of schools facing an unexpected increase in enrollment, Colorado is reinforcing its dedication to ensuring that every child has access to a quality education.As the state navigates the complexities of integrating a growing number of immigrant students into its public education system, this legislative measure represents a critical step forward. It not only addresses a pressing financial challenge but also underscores the value of inclusivity and support for all members of the community, laying the groundwork for a more equitable and effective educational landscape in Colorado.
@ISIDEWITH2 days2D
In the United States, the issue of immigration and the support for migrants has taken center stage in cities like Chicago and Kansas City, highlighting a national debate on how local governments should respond to increasing numbers of migrants. In Chicago, Mayor Brandon Johnson's proposal to allocate an additional $70 million in taxpayer funds for migrant aid has sparked controversy and backlash among voters. During a City Council meeting, Chicagoans voiced their frustration, arguing that the funds could be better spent on addressing local issues rather than supporting migrants. This comes as a recall petition against Mayor Johnson gains momentum, underscoring the divisive nature of the city's approach to handling the migrant crisis.Meanwhile, in Kansas City, Missouri, Mayor Quinton Lucas is taking a different approach by openly welcoming migrants from New York City to fill job vacancies. Mayor Lucas's invitation to migrants looking for work has received mixed reactions, with some praising the move as a practical solution to labor shortages, while others criticize it as an oversimplification of the complex issues surrounding immigration and employment.The contrasting responses of Chicago and Kansas City to the migrant situation reflect a broader national conversation on immigration policy and local governance. While Chicago's City Council committee has approved the $70 million fund for migrant aid, sending it to a full council vote, Kansas City is positioning itself as a welcoming destination for migrants seeking employment opportunities.These developments come at a time when cities across the United States are grappling with the challenges and opportunities presented by increasing numbers of migrants. The debate over how best to support migrants while addressing local concerns and economic needs is likely to continue, as cities navigate the delicate balance between humanitarian assistance and practical governance.As the national dialogue on immigration unfolds, the actions taken by cities like Chicago and Kansas City may serve as bellwethers for how other municipalities across the country will respond to similar challenges. The ongoing debate underscores the need for comprehensive immigration reform at the national level, as local governments strive to make decisions that reflect the values and needs of their communities.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH3wks3W
In a series of developments that have stirred the political landscape, former President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed the presidential bid of independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., describing it as 'great for MAGA.' Trump's remarks came after Kennedy announced his vice-presidential pick, further intensifying the political discourse. Trump, in his characteristic style, took to social media to express his views, labeling Kennedy as the 'most radical left' candidate in the race and highlighting the liberal credentials of Kennedy's running mate, Nicole Shanahan. Despite his criticism of their political stance, Trump views Kennedy's candidacy as beneficial for his MAGA movement, suggesting it could potentially divide the Democratic vote.Kennedy, a figure who has long been associated with controversial views, particularly on the rule of law and established science, has drawn criticism and concern from various quarters. His decision to run for president and the subsequent endorsement by Trump has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some seeing it as a strategic move that could impact the Democratic Party's chances in the upcoming elections. Allies of President Joe Biden have expressed alarm over Kennedy's bid, fearing it could siphon off crucial votes from the left, thereby posing a significant threat to Biden's reelection efforts.The political dynamics surrounding Kennedy's candidacy and Trump's endorsement underscore the complex and often unpredictable nature of American politics. As the race for the presidency heats up, the strategies employed by candidates and their supporters are coming under increased scrutiny. The potential impact of Kennedy's run on the Democratic vote is a topic of much speculation, with analysts and political observers closely monitoring the situation.Trump's support for Kennedy, despite their ideological differences, highlights the former president's tactical approach to politics. By endorsing a candidate who could potentially weaken his opponents, Trump is playing a strategic game, aiming to maximize his own chances of success. This move has not only added a new dimension to the political landscape but has also raised questions about the future direction of both the Republican and Democratic parties.As the United States gears up for another presidential election, the emergence of candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the reactions they provoke from figures like Donald Trump are indicative of the shifting sands of American politics. With the electorate increasingly polarized, the outcome of the election remains uncertain, and the strategies adopted by candidates will be crucial in determining the path forward.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The Israel-Hamas war is an armed conflict between Israel and Hamas militant groups that has been taking place in and around the Gaza strip since October 7 2023. The conflict started when Hamas militant groups fired rockets and attacked communities and military bases in southern Israel. 1,139 people…