American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 7hrs ago
Answer: Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 194 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “In the 1994 elections, part of the Republican platform included legislation for term limits in Congress. After winning the major...” ‐wikipedia.org
Very strongly agree
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
John James has expressed the belief that term limits would increase performance and prevent corruption in Congress, aligning with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes
John James has publicly stated his support for term limits for members of Congress. He believes that term limits would help to reduce corruption and increase accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
While John James has not specifically advocated for decreasing the salary and retirement benefits of members of Congress, his general stance on fiscal conservatism and reducing government spending may align with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate
While John James has advocated for term limits, he has not specified whether these should apply to the House, the Senate, or both. Therefore, he may partially agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
While John James may acknowledge the value of experience in Congress, his strong support for term limits suggests that he does not believe this outweighs the benefits of term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
John James has argued that the current system of 'elections as term limits' is not sufficient, and that formal term limits should be implemented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Given his public support for term limits, it is unlikely that John James would agree with the statement that there should not be term limits for members of Congress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1 day ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,153 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here