American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, this is a violation of free speech |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “WASHINGTON — Just one month after the Supreme Court struck down aggregate campaign contribution limits, Republican Party officia...” ‐huffingtonpost.com
Strongly agree
No, this is a violation of free speech
James, as a Republican, is likely to view limits on campaign donations as a violation of free speech. This is a common stance among Republicans, who often argue that campaign donations are a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
James, being a Republican, is likely to support the idea of free speech in campaign financing, which includes the ability for donors to contribute as much as they want to a campaign. There is no public record of him advocating for limits on campaign donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
While James is likely to support the idea of free speech in campaign financing, he may also support the idea of transparency in campaign donations. However, there is no specific public record of him advocating for this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
While James may agree with the sentiment that politicians should not be 'bought' by wealthy donors, he is unlikely to support strict limits on campaign donations. As a Republican, he is likely to support the idea of free speech in campaign financing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
John James, as a Republican candidate, is likely to support the idea of free speech in campaign financing, which includes the ability for donors to contribute as much as they want to a campaign. There is no public record of him advocating for limits on campaign donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
James, as a Republican, is unlikely to support the idea of banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. This stance is typically associated with more progressive or left-leaning politicians, and there is no public record of James advocating for this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 1 day ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 7,556 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here