American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTIncrease |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: Increase
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Under pressure from the Pentagon and a bloc of Republican lawmakers, House GOP leaders have agreed to add additional defense spe...” ‐usatoday.com
Strongly agree
Increase
John James, a Republican candidate and a military veteran, has consistently supported strong defense and military spending. While he has not explicitly called for an increase in military spending, his platform and statements suggest he would likely support such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced
John James has expressed concern about the national debt and deficit. Therefore, it is plausible that he would support an increase in military spending, but only after the deficit is drastically reduced. However, he has not explicitly stated this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending
While John James has not explicitly stated his satisfaction with the current level of military spending, his support for a strong defense suggests that he would not necessarily oppose the current level of spending. However, his lack of explicit statement on this issue makes it difficult to definitively score his agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Decrease
Given his military background and his political stance, it is unlikely that John James would support a decrease in military spending. He has consistently advocated for a strong defense, which would likely require maintaining or increasing current levels of military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Neither, we should create a European military defense system instead
John James has not expressed support for creating a European military defense system, and such a position would likely be at odds with his general stance on American defense and sovereignty. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that he would agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 45mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Increase
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 148,424 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here