American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 7hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 638 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “WASHINGTON — Slamming the Obama administration for failing to penalize cities that shield illegal immigrants, congressional Repu...” ‐nytimes.com
Strongly agree
No
Given his conservative stance on immigration, it is likely that John James would agree with the statement that sanctuary cities should not receive federal funding. However, without specific public statements on this issue, it is difficult to definitively say he would strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities
John James' conservative views on immigration suggest he might support a ban on sanctuary cities. However, without specific public statements or policy proposals on this issue, it is difficult to definitively say he would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
John James, as a Republican candidate, has consistently aligned with conservative views on immigration. He has not publicly supported sanctuary cities, which are typically associated with more liberal immigration policies. Therefore, it is highly unlikely he would agree with federal funding for sanctuary cities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 7,605 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here