American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 7hrs ago
Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 9,869 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.
Republican Party Answer: Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “We support the development of all forms of energy that are marketable in a free economy without subsidies, including coal, oil, ...” ‐amazonaws.com
Strongly agree
Yes
John James, as a Republican candidate, is likely to support the use of nuclear energy as part of a diverse energy portfolio. However, there is no specific record of him stating his position on nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
John James might support the use of nuclear energy without public subsidy, aligning with conservative principles of limited government intervention in the market. However, there is no specific record of him stating this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
John James might agree with the use of nuclear energy temporarily while increasing investment into cleaner renewable alternatives, aligning with a balanced approach to energy policy. However, there is no specific record of him stating this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with public subsidy
While John James might support the use of nuclear energy, he might be less inclined to support it with public subsidy, given the conservative principle of limited government intervention in the market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
While John James might support investment in cleaner alternatives, it is unlikely that he would oppose nuclear energy in favor of these alternatives. His party generally supports a diverse energy portfolio, including nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given his party's general stance, it is unlikely that John James would oppose the use of nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
John James, as a conservative Republican, would likely strongly disagree with nationalizing the industry, which goes against conservative principles of free market capitalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 155,708 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here