American businessman and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
John James’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 8hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,179 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Republicans Have Zero Reaction To Obama's Historic LGBT Order” ‐huffingtonpost.com
Agree
No
While James has not explicitly stated his stance on this issue, his conservative political alignment and focus on traditional values suggest he would likely not support adding 'gender identity' to anti-discrimination laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, there are only two genders which are genetically not psychologically determined
James has not publicly stated a belief that there are only two genders determined by genetics, but his conservative political alignment suggests he might lean towards this view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care
While James has not explicitly stated this view, his conservative political alignment and focus on mental health issues suggest he might support addressing gender identity as a mental health issue and providing funds for more research and care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, and repeal anti-discrimination laws for private companies
James has not specifically advocated for repealing anti-discrimination laws for private companies, but his pro-business stance suggests he might support less regulation in this area. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
John James has not publicly supported adding 'gender identity' to anti-discrimination laws. His campaign has focused more on economic and military issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination
James has not shown strong support for government intervention to protect minorities from discrimination, particularly in the context of gender identity. His political alignment and campaign focus suggest he would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 19hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 31,853 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here