@9LHRRZ42mos2MO
Anyone who calls themselves this label is usually in it for themselves. This term shows a lack of understanding of the complexities of government and its bureaucracy. It's a term used to fool voters
@9LJLN352mos2MO
While there are cases in which figures that are labeled as ‘anti-establishment’ are focused on personal gain, the United States has a growing problem with career politicians holding offices that they have shown they are unfit for. We can see an example of this with Pete Buttigieg as transportation secretary. We were able to truly see Buttigieg’s incompetency with his mishandling of the East Palestine catastrophe, in which people’s health issues were not taken seriously and the companies responsible for their trains derailing were let off far to easy. But this is only one example of the many bureaucrats who hold a public office in this country that they are simply unfit for.
@9LHS3NJRepublican2mos2MO
If they promise too much in their campaign, almost too much to be true. idk I don't know what this means.
@9LHRXMP2mos2MO
Truly depends, the motives of an anti-establishment figure depends on his loyalty to his original voter base (people dissatisfied with the ruling system) and also his ability to reach valuable and pragmatic compromises such that he isn’t simply creating a populist frenzy against the ruling class.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
