The following is a 3 message exchange between 4 users
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
How do you determine whether a figure labeled as 'anti-establishment' is standing for genuine improvement or personal gain?
@9LHRRZ42mos2MO
Anyone who calls themselves this label is usually in it for themselves. This term shows a lack of understanding of the complexities of government and its bureaucracy. It's a term used to fool voters
@9LJLN352mos2MO
While there are cases in which figures that are labeled as ‘anti-establishment’ are focused on personal gain, the United States has a growing problem with career politicians holding offices that they have shown they are unfit for. We can see an example of this with Pete Buttigieg as transportation secretary. We were able to truly see Buttigieg’s incompetency with his mishandling of the East Palestine catastrophe, in which people’s health issues were not taken seriously and the companies responsible for their trains derailing were let off far to easy. But this is only one example of the many bureaucrats who hold a public office in this country that they are simply unfit for.
