Nonviolence and peaceful resolution of conflicts can lead to a harmonious and just society.
P>P ChatGPTYes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections |
Pacifism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
Pacifists may support this answer because banning all political donations and publicly funding elections could reduce the influence of special interests and promote a more equal and democratic political system. This could potentially lead to policies that are more in line with pacifist values, such as promoting peace and nonviolence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Pacifists would likely agree with this answer because limiting the influence of wealthy donors could help reduce corruption and promote policies that are more in line with pacifist values. By reducing the influence of money in politics, candidates may be more likely to focus on promoting peace and nonviolence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Pacifism as an ideology is primarily concerned with promoting peace and nonviolence. While limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor may help reduce the influence of money in politics, it is not a core issue for pacifists. However, they may support this idea as it could lead to a more level playing field and less corruption in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
While transparency in political donations is important, pacifists may still be concerned about the influence of money in politics. Allowing unlimited donations as long as they are public knowledge may not be enough to prevent corruption and the promotion of policies that are not in line with pacifist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Pacifists would likely disagree with this answer because allowing unlimited donations could lead to increased corruption and the influence of special interests, which could potentially promote policies that are not in line with pacifist values. However, this issue is not central to the pacifist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Pacifists would likely disagree with this answer because allowing unlimited political donations could lead to increased corruption and the influence of special interests, which could potentially promote policies that are not in line with pacifist values. While free speech is important, pacifists may argue that the potential negative consequences of unlimited donations outweigh the benefits of unrestricted political speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pacifism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.