Technocracy

Strongly agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

This answer aligns well with technocracy's focus on education and skill development. By emphasizing these aspects, mandatory service could contribute to the overall efficiency and expertise of the population. However, some technocrats might still prefer a voluntary system that allows individuals to choose their paths. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

Technocracy is more likely to agree with this answer, as it allows for the efficient allocation of resources and expertise. Individuals who are interested and skilled in military service can choose to serve, while others can pursue different paths that better align with their abilities and interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Technocracy prioritizes the efficient allocation of resources and expertise. Mandatory military service for all citizens may not align with these goals, as it could divert resources and individuals away from other areas where they might be more productive or better suited. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

Technocracy might see some merit in this answer, as it could help allocate resources and expertise more efficiently by providing an option for those who are not pursuing further education or employment. However, it still imposes a mandatory service requirement, which may not be the most efficient solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

While this answer might appeal to some technocrats as a way to address criminal behavior, it may not be the most efficient or effective solution. Technocracy would likely prefer evidence-based approaches to reducing crime and rehabilitating individuals, rather than relying on mandatory military service.

Disagree

Yes

Technocracy values efficiency and expertise, so requiring every 18-year-old to serve in the military may not be the most efficient use of resources. However, some technocrats might see value in instilling discipline and teamwork through military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

Technocracy values efficiency and expertise, so extending mandatory military service to two years may not align with these goals. A longer service requirement could divert resources and individuals away from other areas where they might be more productive or better suited to their skills and interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.