These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.
64% Yes |
36% No |
64% Yes |
36% No |
See how support for each position on “First-time Homebuyer Subsidies” has changed over time for 1.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “First-time Homebuyer Subsidies” has changed over time for 1.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MYFTRJ6 days6D
Yes, as long as the subsidies are repaid, like the 2008 subsidies.
@9MLZQLY2wks2W
It would be nice for first time house buyers but the overall population it wouldnt benefit all.
@Dry550 2wks2W
Yes, it’s very expensive buying a house, people should have help the first time, everybody deserves a house
@9MLW5SH2wks2W
No, the government should focus on increasing the supply of housing, not allocating housing
@9MLVFQR2wks2W
Government should regulate the housing market making it easier for everyone to compete.
@9MLJPS72wks2W
In todays economy, it wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world. If we’re talking 10/20 years ago when home-ownership was viable, then no.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
