Green spaces in housing developments are areas designated for parks and natural landscapes to enhance residents' quality of life and environmental health. Proponents argue that it enhances community well-being and environmental quality. Opponents argue that it increases the cost of housing and developers should decide the layout of their projects.
69% Yes |
31% No |
69% Yes |
31% No |
See how support for each position on “Green Spaces” has changed over time for 5k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Green Spaces” has changed over time for 5k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9N2FJTH5 days5D
No regulation. If anything, they minimum property size should be raised to stop full stripping of land for sub developments.
@RobinHoude 6 days6D
No, green space and park requirements would undermine housing density and would likely restrict access to those green spaces to residents of the development only. Green spaces and parks should be provided by the city under public ownership
@9MWD63L1wk1W
This should be decided locally, but yes green spaces and parks ought to be an important consideration in housing development
@9MW4YG51wk1W
A certain percentage of the land should be required to include green spaces or recreational spaces for residences and the environmental impact.
@9MSWNPV1wk1W
Yes green space with minimal upkeep, but not in a Single family community where they already have yard spaces.
@9MSGYVD1wk1W
No, deregulate property development and reduce the scope of zoning laws so that developers and local governments can provide these amenities as they are demanded by the consumer.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
