Fuel efficiency standards set the required average fuel economy for vehicles, aiming to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it helps reduce emissions, save consumers money on fuel, and decrease reliance on fossil fuels. Opponents argue that it raises production costs, leading to higher vehicle prices, and may not have a significant impact on overall emissions.
51% Yes |
49% No |
51% Yes |
49% No |
See how support for each position on “Fuel Efficiency Requirements” has changed over time for 235 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Fuel Efficiency Requirements” has changed over time for 235 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MZC7786 days6D
No and repeal current standards that result in larger, less efficient being built over smaller vehicles like small pickups that can't meet standards.
@9MYY7PJ6 days6D
No, but there should be emission standards to reduce pollution and prevent poor air quality
@2TXP8NB 7 days7D
The government should set a goal of 100% electric vehicles on our roads, and then make that happen.
@9MQ2X4M1wk1W
Yes, but I would rather focus on preserving fuel and make cars run more energy efficient.
@9MN8ZKT2wks2W
Yes, create stricter standards for SUVs and light trucks that have gotten away with less strict standards for years under CAFE laws
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
