@ISIDEWITHQuestionsNational securityStarted 2wks agoActive 10hrs ago

Should the government invest in artificial intelligence (AI) for defense applications?

AI in defense refers to the use of artificial intelligence technologies to enhance military capabilities, such as autonomous drones, cyber defense, and strategic decision-making. Proponents argue that AI can significantly enhance military effectiveness, provide strategic advantages, and improve national security. Opponents argue that AI poses ethical risks, potential loss of human control, and can lead to unintended consequences in critical situations.

53%
Yes
47%
No
53%
Yes
47%
No

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Defense” has changed over time for 1.2k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Defense” has changed over time for 1.2k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9MSTKDB from Illinois answered…1wk1W

Yes but needs testing for proof that it is more effective than humans as well as employed with unbiased/ethical considerations

 @9MM5PH4 from New Jersey answered…2wks2W

Yes, but increase oversight with strict regulations.

 @9MM585G from PR answered…2wks2W

We should invest in AI but we have to give access to people who actually want to better certain aspects of the world and not fall in the hands of corrupted people

 @9MM4BH6 from California answered…2wks2W

Only when AI has reached a certain level of sophistication.

 @9MM2TC5 from California answered…2wks2W

I feel like it should be private companies that are doing the research, so that there will be more job openings in that field.

 @9MLZRDV from New York answered…2wks2W

Maybe, If its built for it it could be good but it could malfunction

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.

 @ISIDEWITH asked…2mos2MO

Do you believe that strategic political endorsements are fair play, or do they undermine the integrity of the electoral…

In a series of developments that have stirred the political landscape, former President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed the presidential bid of independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., describing it as 'great for MAGA.' Trump's remarks came after Kennedy announced his vice-presidential pick, further intensifying the political discourse. Trump, in his characteristic style, took to social media to express his views, labeling Kennedy as the 'most radical left' candidate in the race and highlighting the liberal credentials of Kennedy's running mate, Nicole Shanahan. Despite his criticism of their political stance, Trump views Kennedy's candidacy as beneficial for his MAGA movement, suggesting it could potentially divide the Democratic vote.Kennedy, a figure who has long been associated with controversial views, particularly on the rule of law and established science, has drawn criticism and concern from various quarters. His decision to run for president and the subsequent endorsement by Trump has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some seeing it as a strategic move that could impact the Democratic Party's chances in the upcoming elections. Allies of President Joe Biden have expressed alarm over Kennedy's bid, fearing it could siphon off crucial votes from the left, thereby posing a significant threat to Biden's reelection efforts.The political dynamics surrounding Kennedy's candidacy and Trump's endorsement underscore the complex and often unpredictable nature of American politics. As the race for the presidency heats up, the strategies employed by candidates and their supporters are coming under increased scrutiny. The potential impact of Kennedy's run on the Democratic vote is a topic of much speculation, with analysts and political observers closely monitoring the situation.Trump's support for Kennedy, despite their ideological differences, highlights the former president's tactical approach to politics. By endorsing a candidate who could potentially weaken his opponents, Trump is playing a strategic game, aiming to maximize his own chances of success. This move has not only added a new dimension to the political landscape but has also raised questions about the future direction of both the Republican and Democratic parties.As the United States gears up for another presidential election, the emergence of candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the reactions they provoke from figures like Donald Trump are indicative of the shifting sands of American politics. With the electorate increasingly polarized, the outcome of the election remains uncertain, and the strategies adopted by candidates will be crucial in determining the path forward.

▲  31 reply