@ISIDEWITHQuestionsscienceStarted 2wks agoActive 12hrs ago

Should the government regulate the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications?

CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.

58%
Yes
42%
No
58%
Yes
42%
No

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “CRISPR Technology” has changed over time for 1.8k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “CRISPR Technology” has changed over time for 1.8k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9MMD6HL from North Carolina answered…2wks2W

Yes, but only in terms of preventing disease, disorders, and significant health issues. This should not be applied to physical appearance.

 @9N2FJTH from Texas answered…5 days5D

Yes, at the state or local level. There should be basic laws implemented to protect human life and dignity.

 @9MMW4Z8 from Michigan answered…2wks2W

Depending on the exact modifications it is being used for

 @9MMQ8BG from Massachusetts answered…2wks2W

There should be no genetic modifications to human DNA

 @9MM5563 from Minnesota answered…2wks2W

Yes and no, as long as it doesn’t affect a life..Mainly depends on the situation.

 @9MM4HQS from California answered…2wks2W

I think it depends specifically on who is doing the editing of genomes. It can be helpful but it depends in general.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.

 @ISIDEWITH asked…2mos2MO

How do you feel about a candidate's political stance influencing endorsements from prominent figures with opposing views…

In a series of developments that have stirred the political landscape, former President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed the presidential bid of independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., describing it as 'great for MAGA.' Trump's remarks came after Kennedy announced his vice-presidential pick, further intensifying the political discourse. Trump, in his characteristic style, took to social media to express his views, labeling Kennedy as the 'most radical left' candidate in the race and highlighting the liberal credentials of Kennedy's running mate, Nicole Shanahan. Despite his criticism of their political stance, Trump views Kennedy's candidacy as beneficial for his MAGA movement, suggesting it could potentially divide the Democratic vote.Kennedy, a figure who has long been associated with controversial views, particularly on the rule of law and established science, has drawn criticism and concern from various quarters. His decision to run for president and the subsequent endorsement by Trump has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some seeing it as a strategic move that could impact the Democratic Party's chances in the upcoming elections. Allies of President Joe Biden have expressed alarm over Kennedy's bid, fearing it could siphon off crucial votes from the left, thereby posing a significant threat to Biden's reelection efforts.The political dynamics surrounding Kennedy's candidacy and Trump's endorsement underscore the complex and often unpredictable nature of American politics. As the race for the presidency heats up, the strategies employed by candidates and their supporters are coming under increased scrutiny. The potential impact of Kennedy's run on the Democratic vote is a topic of much speculation, with analysts and political observers closely monitoring the situation.Trump's support for Kennedy, despite their ideological differences, highlights the former president's tactical approach to politics. By endorsing a candidate who could potentially weaken his opponents, Trump is playing a strategic game, aiming to maximize his own chances of success. This move has not only added a new dimension to the political landscape but has also raised questions about the future direction of both the Republican and Democratic parties.As the United States gears up for another presidential election, the emergence of candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the reactions they provoke from figures like Donald Trump are indicative of the shifting sands of American politics. With the electorate increasingly polarized, the outcome of the election remains uncertain, and the strategies adopted by candidates will be crucial in determining the path forward.

▲  2