Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
4>4 Personal answerPro-choice |
Social › Gay Marriage
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Equal Pay
4>4 Personal answerStop sexism. What's the difference? Pay for the work they do. Pay for their good results. Pay for intelligence. Pay for talent. Not for gender. Idiots. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerYou should give guns only for intelligent ppl. :D Problem solved. |
Social › Gender Identity
4>4 Personal answerAre you stupid? It is only identifying a person's gender. It is not sexism or discrimination. |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answerStop racism. Or ups how do you call ignoring by religion? Whatever. Stop that. |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
4>4 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
4>4 Personal answerShould you not raise minimum wage for those who don't work? Only intelligence, talent and useful work can bring and create real valuable money. |
the Environment › Climate Change
4>4 Personal answerAll ppl should increase their own regulations not the government. All serious business giants should do that too if they want to be popular and liked. :D |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
4>4 Personal answerFuck no. You work - you get money. No work - no money. Work and grow your kids. It's your choice. Or don't have any kids. Or make in advance enough money to take care of your future kid and yourself that you won't brag for welfare, idiot. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
4>4 Personal answerYeah!! Drugs should be banned!!!! Fucking banned!!!!! For every single person! (Except hospitals and during surgery ). |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
4>4 Personal answerNo, if all members will be real workers who do real work and put effort every day in their work, and do useful actions while working, and who use their intelligence for real. |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
4>4 Personal answerNo!!! Military is a mission, a calling. Some ppl were born and created with this mission, some ppl were born with other missions. Stop bothering those who don't want to. They have rights to choose. It's their lives. It is them. |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerStop acting like idiots!!! You can't ignore ppl or act like they are wore than you because of their religion. Whata fuck??? -.- Seriously???? What if they are more intelligent than you? And maybe you are worse neighbor. Think about your actions first and about your way of thinking talking about other ppl. |
Immigration › Immigration
4>4 Personal answerFuck no. Why other ppl are illegal immigrants and those who have kids suddenly should become legal? WTF? What is the difference? Social status? That they have kids? WTF? They are no better than other ppl who don't have kids. Kids don't make you special or better person with better and different rights (you just have more responsibility and that's it). |
Education › Student Loans
4>4 Personal answerHell no. As I said earlier. Everything depends on how much work you do and much effort you use, what intelligence you have, that's what creates value everywhere. There is big possibility that rich ppl made money with their own efforts and unique hard work and intelligence. That's not fair to take away their own efforts (money) and give for free for other ppl who did nothing. It a student is good student, then you can support him or her. With rich person's agreement for it. |
Healthcare › Marijuana
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › Confederate Flag
4>4 Personal answerYes, whatever. If you like the flag just display it. There is no need to be stupid and create only a negative symbol of flag. |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
4>4 Personal answerHow this is connected? They are on the no fly list by other reasons. It doesn't mean they can't keep a gun safely and use it without harming someone. Maybe they brought Apple computer to plane's salon?? So what? Then they were banned to fly in that company's planes. :D And so on.. Bla blabla. Ir they were drunk. Then yeahhh, from drinking ppl you should ban and guns. Because their brains and hearts are damaged, they can't use a gun safely (and only for protection, and training). Anyway. Guns - only for protection (for intelligent ppl) and for training (for security workers and similar professions). |
Social › Government Mandates
4>4 Personal answerNo, the government should not decide what services a private business can provide |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerSometimes, if they are bored. :DD They can check person's life but they can't try to get some benefits from it. Or they can't try to control someone like this. No no. |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
4>4 Personal answerShould every Congress man be responsible and control itself? Ups, himself. (or herself). And his or her actions. |
Social › Women in Combat
4>4 Personal answerAs I said earlier - stop sexism!!!!!! Everyone can do what they want and desire (about profession) |
Immigration › Illegal Immigrant Detainment
4>4 Personal answerEverything depends on how much work you do and much effort you use, what intelligence you have, that's what creates value everywhere. If ppl do work (whatever they are) and make money with their own efforts and unique hard work, and intelligence then everything is fair. Minor crime can be interpreted in local place. |
Healthcare › Medicaid
4>4 Personal answerMaybe sometimes. Depends on situation. But only for serious unexpected illness issues. For those ppl who lived like animals and ruined their own health and brain you can't compensate anything. |
Immigration › Border Security
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
4>4 Personal answerStop sexism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn it! Of course women can govern (and there is no need for pointing the gender of director) |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
4>4 Personal answerFuck you no. Stop giving tax credits for everything. Earn your own money by working and not collecting it from taxes (other ppl work). Fuck youuu. |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
4>4 Personal answerAs I said earlier. omg these questions are annoying already. the same. jeez. Everything depends on how much work you do and much effort you use, what intelligence you have, that's what creates value everywhere. If ppl do work (whatever they are) and make money with their own efforts and unique hard work, and intelligence - they deserve healthcare. |
Immigration › Immigrant Laborers
4>4 Personal answerWhy not? As I said earlier...... OMG. This is getting so annoying. Everything depends on how much work you do and much effort you use, what intelligence you have, that's what creates value everywhere. If ppl do work (whatever they are) and make money with their own efforts and unique hard work, and intelligence then everything is fair. |
Elections › Voter Fraud
4>4 Personal answerMaybe only for policy and government family members. Or maybe for no one. Whatever. |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
4>4 Personal answerYou should deal with terrorist attacks in other ways. By finding a way to communicate, to talk maybe. But not by answering with the same strict actions to all country from which terrorist attack happened. Good ppl also live in that country. Like there are bad ppl in every country. You can't make all country's life worse and strict because of few (or only because of 1000) stupid ppl actions and way of thinking. You have to find a way to communicate with other ppl from that country. You have to find a way to enlighten those ppl. |
the Economy › Government Spending
4>4 Personal answerNo, fuck you. Those who create valuable money (and value for all economy) with their intelligence and useful work, and with their real efforts, they can spend it. Not others. And no one can control those ppl, who do useful work and create value. |
Foreign Policy › Israel
4>4 Personal answerNo, as I said earlier - stop fucking wars and games with ppl lives!!!!!!! Idiots!!! |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
4>4 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Social › First Amendment
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
4>4 Personal answerDepends on every unique situation. |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
4>4 Personal answerNope. Just except some particular situations, for example some juvelines are too stupid to be not affected by negative criminal's thoughts. But criminal also can give some good advices for young ppl (and even do some good influence) and they can learn both something from each other. They can communicate at first with special supervision, but not always, depends on particular situation again. |
Social › Euthanasia
4>4 Personal answerIt's their choice |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
4>4 Personal answerWhy not? As I said earlier...... OMG. This is getting so annoying. Everything depends on how much work you do and much effort you use, what intelligence you have, that's what creates value everywhere. If ppl do work (whatever they are) and make money with their own efforts and unique hard work, and intelligence then everything is fair. |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
4>4 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Labor Unions
4>4 Personal answerHelp, if money they have in their union came from other business ppl who created those money with their VALUABLE INTELLIGENT REAL WORK AND EFFORTS WHILE WORKING. Hurt, if they donate useless money (worthless, created without any real work, just paper leaves). |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
4>4 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
4>4 Personal answerWhy not? As I said earlier...... OMG. This is getting so annoying. Everything depends on how much work you do and much effort you use, what intelligence you have, that's what creates value everywhere. If ppl do work (whatever they are) and make money with their own efforts and unique hard work, and intelligence then everything is fair. |
Education › Common Core
4>4 Personal answerWhat is that. |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
4>4 Personal answerWhy? Do you need that so badly? Are American people out of oil? Or do you want only money? :D Then, no way. Find safer ways (and more friendly to environment) to earn your useless money. |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
4>4 Personal answerWho cares? Stop grabbing lands. Stay in your place, it doesn't matter how you call yourself. |
Healthcare › Obamacare
4>4 Personal answerNo. Healthcare system and pharmaceuticals bring the biggest money. Stop stealing it. And stop making drugs which make ppl buy more drugs, and make them ill after more years (later). Sell only real useful, healthy pharmaceuticals. Stop doing business from ppl health and lives. That's too cruel!!!!! I am angry!!! |
the Environment › Fracking
4>4 Personal answerWhat we can do and use instead? If there are no options, then yup, I support. :D |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
4>4 Personal answerNo. Private property is private. :D Only security guys can check some things but not everything.!! (but not for government and not for it's order, because in this way creepy controlling appears, but not security). |
Foreign Policy › Torture
4>4 Personal answerLearn to get information with humanly methods. By talking and communicating. Mediating. |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
4>4 Personal answerSTOP WAR. Start communicating and trying to understand and respect different culture. And then they will answer the same. Now it is partly your fault with situation in North Korea. |
Foreign Policy › ISIS Ground Troops
4>4 Personal answeras I said earlier and before that - hell no! And NO. Stop wars!!! |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
4>4 Personal answerNah? Because it's partly your fault that other countries' for which you spend lost (and loses) their money and value. (and ppl) |
Foreign Policy › Drones
4>4 Personal answerNo, because that's a war game!!! STOP FUCKING WAR! JUST collaborate with other countries, communicate, mediate, exchange experiences. |
Domestic Policy › Social Security
4>4 Personal answerNo way! Let the sexy security guys rest at the age of 50. Or nope, 45. Maybe 40. :DD They are worth it. Their job is already hard enough, they work twice compared to simple person. |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
4>4 Personal answerSuspect is not a criminal. What is with this question. And then again.. A criminal shouldn't have any rights? why? he or she isn't a human being? or what??? WTF? We all were born with rights. How can you take it away? A right to be yourself, a right to have a name, a right to be protected. |
Foreign Policy › War on ISIS
4>4 Personal answerNo, stupid USA!!!!!! Stop killing ppl and taking lands. |
Science › Space Exploration
4>4 Personal answerSometimes. Depends on project. And it's seriousness. |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
4>4 Personal answerYEAH, definitely !!!!!! And there is no need for reporting how much money you've stored in other foreign account. That should be those countries' concern. That particular account. And information about it. |
the Economy › Federal Reserve
4>4 Personal answerShould Federal Reserve Bank be ruled by intelligent clean- living person? Who cares where did he or she came from. Congress, street. Intelligence and high moral standards can lead you to real (bigger than now) success. |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
4>4 Personal answerTrust your workers and allies. It is because you chose them. Why to follow then? |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
4>4 Personal answerIt's not only his decision, lol. And not only USA's decision. What's with this question? |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
4>4 Personal answerPrices will stabilize by themselves. Stop ruining business ppl days. |
Foreign Policy › Russian Airstrikes in Syria
4>4 Personal answerAs I said earlier lots of time. Stop war. It's partly your fault. Stop playing around. Stay human. |
the Economy › Property Taxes
4>4 Personal answerHell no! No fucking way. Neverrrrrrrrrr!!!! Don't you dare increase it. |
the Economy › Pension Reform
4>4 Personal answerYeah, if persons wants it. Ask everyone individually. |
the Economy › Bitcoin
4>4 Personal answerWould that formality change something to their work? I think no. Leave them alone. |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
4>4 Personal answerNot too much. If products are good they will find a way to be sold. There is no big need for stupid marketing things. And commercials. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.