Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Healthcare › COVID Mask Mandate
C>C Personal answerYes, especially indoors or crowded areas. But those with certain medical conditions (asthma, COPD, or other breathing disorders) should be allowed to wear a face shield instead of a mask. |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
C>C Personal answerYes, lets get these kids into a home where they are wanted. Children are raised by groups of people not just parents. Anyone the kids come into contact with for a long period of time shape who these kids are. Teachers, aunts, uncles, grandparents, single parents, sometimes even siblings. So if someone is willing to give their love to these kids and provide for their basic needs, then they should be allowed to. They might even grow up better that other children. |
Social › Abortion
C>C Personal answerPro life, but if the woman provides a valid reason, (rape, incest, danger to mother or child) I don't view abortion as a method of birth control. I believe there should be a penalty if a second abortion is requested because the person is irresponsible. Being poor and unable to get protection from pregnancy or financially care for a child should not be a reason to get an abortion. Being too young should not be a reason either. You choose to have sex, now take up the responsibility of your actions or give the baby up for adoption. |
Social › Gay Marriage
C>C Personal answerI believe God gave us free well to choose either His way or our own. Personally I believe it should be between one man and one woman as God intended. But who am I or anyone else have the right to take away a persons free will if God gave them free will. Now if they want to get married it is their choice, but they should not make someone marry them if it is against their beliefs. So a church shouldn't have to. But I also don't think the church should kick them out either if they do. Let love win them over and let God do the changing and the judging. This is also where small business might refuse services too. So anyone looking to get married should make sure they choose those who will except them and not make people change in order to accommodate them. Why would you want someone who doesn't like you to handle anything on your special day? |
the Economy › Equal Pay
C>C Personal answerIf men and women are doing the EXACT same job, then yes, they should be paid exactly the same. If a man or woman does better than their colleagues, then they should be paid higher in accordance to their skill. One person should not be paid equally just because they are a man or woman, and they do a very bad job at what they do. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
C>C Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training |
Crime › Police Body Cameras
C>C Personal answerYes, this will protect the safety and rights of police officers and citizens |
Healthcare › Drug Price Regulation
C>C Personal answerThe government should regulate the price of life saving drugs but only to a certai point where the private infustry can still put large investments in reaserch and development. |
Healthcare › Pre-Existing Conditions
C>C Personal answerNo, it is immoral to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions |
Social › Gun Buyback
C>C Personal answerMaking it mandatory won't work they will just hide their weapons or buy from blackmarket or something like that. Either way people find a way. If criminals can, then law abiding citizens will find a way if they feel the need. Make it optional. But enforce proper storage of all guns, registration on all guns, and background checks on anyone wanting to buy a gun. Maybe even mental evaluations every so often. A stable person could become unstable at anytime due to many factors like loss of job, spouse, kids, traumatic experiences. We don't want our kids to get their parents guns. |
Social › Gender Identity
C>C Personal answerEvery human being deserves respect. It is sad a law needs to exist. This law should only exist if a person is truly being treated badly by a company. I hope people do not use this law as a way to abuse the system and slack off or get something for free. |
Healthcare › Mental Health
C>C Personal answerA combination of public and private research would likely be best. |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
C>C Personal answerIt depends. A business should be able to refuse to perform a particular request that conflicts with their beliefs, but should not be able to deny service to a customer due to prejudice against the person. Small business and the owner needs to make it clear to the patrons what services they will not provide due to their religious beliefs (through a posted sign perhaps) from the day the business starts but still not deny service to a person unless they are disruptive in the functioning of the business or become dangerous to those in the area. It is the owner's responsibility to make customers aware of what they will refuse to do in their line of business and do so in a calm and concise manner. Corporations should not be allowed to refuse. It would be better to treat people with love than hate. You are more likely to gain peoples respect if you treat them kindly. They might even be willing to hear your beliefs if you treat them kindly. Love them and let God do the judging come judgment day. For all you know you could be the reason they refuse to believe. |
Social › Transgender Athletes
C>C Personal answerYes and no. Anyone who wants to compete and qualify should be allowed to as long as they are not using drugs to cheat. A change of sex also should not be allowed in order to cheat. It would not be far if a man who changes to female and then competes in female events and wins everything. We have separate events for the handicap for this very reason. So that they can enjoy the sport they love but have a fair advantage with those like them. Maybe it should be regulated like they do is wrestling. People with same weight fight those of similar weight. Or maybe like racing. Need to qualify at a certain time to qualify for the safety of those in the race. But if we do that then girls and boys should be able to compete together instead of separately based on their athletic ability. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
C>C Personal answerWe should not ban them however, there should be a screening process for all immigrants, not just muslims to decide if they are a threat to anyone, anything or national security. |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
C>C Personal answerYes, as long as funding is not used for abortion procedures |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
C>C Personal answerNo, this will only cause prices to increase in a never ending cycle |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
C>C Personal answerNo, install other precautions to keep gun violence out of school |
the Environment › Climate Change
C>C Personal answerThe people should be the main channel of defense against the changing climate, producing the most effective societal output towards the preservation of wildlife through free voluntary transactions and innovation. Politicians have a terrible track record when it comes to protecting the environment. |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
C>C Personal answerYes but there should be an agreed upon time for every case at the beginning of hiring. That way the employee can choose whether they really want to work for so said company. For pregnancy defiantly, but if a company is too small to provide full wages then reduce the amount paid. You technically hire someone to do a job. If they are not there to do it, then they shouldn't be paid the same a someone who is there. I think it also depends on worth ethics. So if it is someone constantly calling off for sick leave or personal issues, then maybe they shouldn't work there. But I think a company should provide some sick, personal leave, vacation time as an incentive. And the amount should either be universal to all employees or earned for years of service. If they are not doing their job and are abusing the system, then let them go. If they use up their time off and still need more time off, then they should know they won't get paid at all for those extra unworked days. I understand some people can get really sick and unable to work, like those with cancer. But a company still needs to function and if they can't function because someone is gone then they should either have the right to find a temporary replacement or hire someone new altogether. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
C>C Personal answerI think it depends. Drugs that offer medicinal benefits should have a prescription like any other pharmaceutical drug. Others should be charged for the illegal drug and then given help to get them off. And if any drug causes the person to commit a crime, then of course they should be charged for the crime and the drug use unless they can prove they didn't purposely take the drug willingly or that it was prescribed to them by a doctor. |
the Economy › Taxes
C>C Personal answerClose all loopholes so that they pay their fair share. Do not raise taxes on them, especially not billionaire corporations since they will raise prices on us. |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
C>C Personal answerNo, politicians are not meant to serve for life, however people should have the right to re-elect someone if they feel that the representative is doing a good job in office. There are other ways to limit the corruption of politics. |
Foreign Policy › Iran
C>C Personal answerWar should be avoided. Until they pose and actual threat and show aggression we should strive for diplomatic solutions. |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
C>C Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
C>C Personal answerNo, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion |
Social › Racial Sensitivity Training
C>C Personal answerNo, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination |
Elections › Foreign Lobbying
C>C Personal answerNo, foreign interests should not be able to buy the influence of our politicians |
Education › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
C>C Personal answerNo, they should be taught race related history objectively and understand the bad things that have been done so as to avoid it happening ever again. |
Immigration › Immigration
C>C Personal answerYes, and it should allow their parents the ability to be granted temporary citizenship until they have completed the citizenship application process |
Education › Free College for All
C>C Personal answerNo, universities and colleges need to provide this education to students for a lower cost than they are currently. Also, the interest rates for student loans are outrageous. We should be able to receive an education without going into such crippling debt because of it. |
Education › Student Loans
C>C Personal answer-No, but we should still reduce interest rates for student loans. Students shouldn’t be penalized by the banks for being new adults in the world and just try to get their education. and , again, the rich should not be taxed more just because they make more money than other people. |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
C>C Personal answerYes |
Social › Death Penalty
C>C Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Marijuana
C>C Personal answerYes, for medicinal use. And if legalized for all then it should be regulated the way alcohol is regulated, with similar laws limiting use during certain activities such as driving. And if they cause problems or break laws while on it, then they should be charged accordingly. |
Social › Government Mandates
C>C Personal answerNot necessarily required to offer, but have it be there upon request, if needed, and covered finance-wise, dealt out as a prescription |
Social › Confederate Flag
C>C Personal answerI am torn. Everyone views things differently. I don't think we should destroy historical significance because of what people believe it stands or stood for. If we destroy it, then we are doomed to repeat it. If anything our total history faults and all should be placed in museums, and taught about in schools but acknowledge the good with the bad and use it as a reminder of what happened and what could happen again if we don't choose to make things better. |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
C>C Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
C>C Personal answerNo, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity |
Domestic Policy › Supreme Court Reform
C>C Personal answerYes |
Social › Women in Combat
C>C Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Immigration › Illegal Immigrant Detainment
C>C Personal answerI think regardless of crime, if they are illegal then they should be handed over to federal authorities. But then given an option to become a legal citizen. If they choose not to, then deport them. If they will, then give them a certain amount of reasonable time to do so. |
Healthcare › Medicaid
C>C Personal answerI am not informed enough to form a full opinion. |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
C>C Personal answerNo, but require vaccination in order to attend public school |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
C>C Personal answerI think the government should be able to regulate content on the internet if they have enough evidence to prove the content was fake or misleading. |
Immigration › Border Security
C>C Personal answerMake it easier for immigrants to come here legally, this way they don't feel the need to come illegally |
Crime › Private Prisons
C>C Personal answerI do not know enough about this topic to have an opinion. |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
C>C Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender but they also need to represent their employees. If it is better to have diversity to better represent your employees and the needs of those you service, then you should. |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
C>C Personal answerYes, as long as the illegal immigrants in question are good, honest people with no criminal record who plan on becomming citizens |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
C>C Personal answerYes, as long as the benefit outweighs the financial cost |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
C>C Personal answerNo, the federal government should not fund sanctuary cities. however the federal government cannot ban sanctuary cities since this is within the jurisdiction of the states and cities involved. Let state's/local governments decide if they want to make their city a "Sanctuary City" or fund sanctuary cities within their state. |
Elections › Campaign Finance
C>C Personal answerNo as long as the donor is an individual. Not a company, group, foreign county, or organization. They should be allowed to waste their money where ever they want. But if the money is used to buy votes or for the candidate to go a certain way then they should not be allowed to accept the money or forfeit their candidacy or term. People vote for a person to represent them as a whole. They should follow what the mass majority voted them in for. |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
C>C Personal answerI do not know enough about this to place a vote or give an opinion. |
Immigration › Immigrant Laborers
C>C Personal answerYes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record |
Elections › Voter Fraud
C>C Personal answerYes, but citizens should receive a free, government-issued ID card on their eighteenth birthday. |
the Environment › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
C>C Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
C>C Personal answerLower for small businesses, raise for big businesses, eliminate deductions, and loop holes |
Social › Safe Spaces
C>C Personal answerYes and no. Students choose their classes for the most part and they can choose to walk out of a class. If a student knows there is something that the teacher might discuss and they can't take another class, then they can share the information with the teacher. Then maybe the teacher can work with the student on something else they can do to help the student still learn information that they need. This can't always work and I know some people want some privacy. But if it is a serious issue, then it would be wise to give the teacher the information so they can work with you and not against you. I also know that in some cases things come up out of the blue without warning. The teacher can't know everything that can trigger an episode. What they can do is come up with an opening sentence at the bringing of school or every class, that if anything become offensive then they can walk out of class but be given an equivalent assignment for participation. Hopefully kids won't abuse the system. Kids need to be prepared for the world and they can't if they copout or abuse the system. It's meant for legitimate needs. |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
the Economy › Government Spending
C>C Personal answerCut the spending on things that do not directly affect the public. Justify the "needs" of spending rather then the "wants". |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
C>C Personal answerOnly to age 16 and only if they can prove they have enough knowledge of government to make their own decisions. We don't want more voters that are only going to vote for whoever their parents, or friends tell them to vote for. They need to make the decision based on their own understanding of each issue. |
Foreign Policy › Israel
C>C Personal answerYes, it is extremist who are the enemy not the country when one religion is popular. |
Foreign Policy › NATO
C>C Personal answerAs long as other countries spend their fair share for their military |
Immigration › Border Wall
C>C Personal answerNo, but increase our military presence along the southern border |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
C>C Personal answerNo, they should have a choice but it should be heavily recommended, seeing as it is our countries main language. |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
Crime › Defunding the Police
C>C Personal answerFunding should be somewhat redirected but police training should also be upgraded. More extensive and educational training along with proper de-escalating and tests to make sure there will be no bias in the officer's judgement. |
Social › First Amendment
C>C Personal answerNo, separation of church and state means keeping government out of church, not keeping church out of government. It is a protection of the 1st amendment. Everything that references God already should be kept as it is part of our history, but if you don't want to include it on new things then don't. If a person doesn't was to stay the pledge of allegiance because of the "one nation under God," then they have that right. There is no need to erase what is already there. If it is a big deal, then do a popular vote. If the mass majority says remove, then that is what the people want. As long as we can still believe in whatever religion we want that doesn't physical, not emotional, hurt someone then we should be allowed to believe what we want. I say not emotionally because there are those few people that like to abuse the system to have their way just because they can. |
Healthcare › Medicaid Work Requirement
C>C Personal answerOnly if they are able to. They should receive help in order to find a job that they can perform |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
C>C Personal answerVictims should be allowed to sue manufacturers only if there is an issue with gun as they are only responsible for the making of the gun, or if it is a weapon that violates laws that civilians are supposed to have. Dealers can be sued if the person who committed the crime did not pass sufficient background checks and the dealer did not conduct thorough investigations. |
Social › Niqāb
C>C Personal answerYes. Thanks to Covid-19 everyone must wear masks. So if that is the case, then these women should be allowed to wear their veils. If it is that much of a security risk, then have a security check point where they have to show their face briefly for security checks in order to get in. And as for the so called society which relies on facial recognition and expression in communication, well nobody really talks to anyone anymore. They are too busy texting each other on their phones. |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
C>C Personal answerYes, but only if they're permanent residents or planning to become citizens. |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
C>C Personal answerNo, the punishment should fit the crime. If the person is a threat to others or themselves then solitary confinement should be used. Basically, juveniles should be treated the same as adults. They should be placed in solitary confinement if the crime justifies it. |
Social › Euthanasia
C>C Personal answerYes, but only if they go through a psychological examination to show they fully understand the choice, and if they have little to no chance of surviving. Also any family members should know of this choice. And both the patient and a family member sign a waiver saying they will not seek legal action against the hospital or those in charge of the assisted suicide. There should also be witnesses that sign the waiver as well. |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
C>C Personal answerDecision should reflect néed and demand |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
C>C Personal answerNo test, but they should be educated so they have a chance to survive and stay out of trouble. |
Crime › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
C>C Personal answerdepends on circumstance. |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
C>C Personal answeryes and no. I don't think anyone should get favorable treatments based on race, but I know that without affirmative action there would be way too much racism against minorities. |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
C>C Personal answerYes, provide safe havens, but make the safe haven a treatment center where the person who enters as an addict, leaves a former addict. |
Healthcare › Medicare Drug Prices
C>C Personal answerI do not know enough to place a vote or give an opinion. |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
C>C Personal answerYes and no. The proper way to retire a flag is by burning and there are guidelines for doing so. Burning a flag can technically be seen as a form of freedom of speech. Do I agree with it no. But if so said person(s) goes on someones property to burn the flag and was not given permission, that should be seen as a threat to that person. Also if the group gets violent then they should be charged for those crimes not necessarily for buying the flag, but for the threat of harm to another human being or property. |
the Economy › Welfare
C>C Personal answerReform the system, ensure welfare recipients are actively doing what they need to do to remove themselves from welfare. Oversight need to be better. A pipeline out of the system needs to be created to limit dependency on welfare. welfare should not be lifelong. |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
the Economy › Labor Unions
C>C Personal answerBoth, they protect the workers, but also sometimes bar the workers. |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
C>C Personal answerYes, but only in times of extreme/catastrophic economic circumstances |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
C>C Personal answerRecipients need to be treated the same as anyone who has a job in the work force, they need to be drug free and they need to do something productive in order to continue getting benefits |
Elections › Campaign Finance
C>C Personal answerNo, only individuals should be allowed to donate and only US citizens. Companies and organizations should use their money to benefit their company and their employees. It makes it too easy for a company to try to buy votes or to get a candidate to go a certain way. It's also not fair for one candidate to get a lot of money while another candidate doesn't get hardly anything. Over all I kind of think every candidate should get the same amount to spend on their advertising. Let this be a test on how well they budget their money before they start spending taxes payers money in office. Too much money is wasted. I detest commercials trash talking other candidates. I would rather hear what they can do. |
the Environment › Dakota Access Pipeline
C>C Personal answerNo, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land and land that would be very negatively effected by a spill, and drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident. |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
C>C Personal answerYes and no. Not sure if we should contribute more than anyone else. It should be the same and only if it truly helps everyone in the long run. If money is being wasted or their is power abuse, then I think we should stop and do our own thing. |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
C>C Personal answerYes, if they are in the process of getting citizenship. |
Education › Common Core
C>C Personal answerNo, teach to each student's potential instead of uniform testing |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
C>C Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
C>C Personal answerYes but only so we do not have to give up our voice in the world and so we can let others no where we stand publicly on issues that are brought forward to the body. |
Foreign Policy › Afghanistan
C>C Personal answerWe should reduce the number of troops slowly and aid the country in establishing/maintaining a stable and fair government. |
Healthcare › Obamacare
C>C Personal answerWe should work to decrease the costs of health care so that insurance isn't necessary to receive quality health care. |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
C>C Personal answerIf they can't make good financial choices in their own life, do we really want them messing with tax payers money. |
the Environment › Fracking
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
Elections › Lobbyists
C>C Personal answerI cannot speak on this |
the Economy › Overtime Pay
C>C Personal answerIt depends, Salaried workers went into the job with an agreed upon amount for so much work. Not sure how that is measured. If an employee is using their time wisely then I think a company should reward their employee for working over time if they approved the over time. But if it is someone who is just working slowly, I don't think they should be rewarded for not getting their required job done so late. Also I don't think a person should be able to take off whenever just because they are salary. If every job went to hourly instead, this wouldn't be an issue. |
Elections › Electoral College
C>C Personal answerYes, and switch to a representative democracy (popular vote) system |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
C>C Personal answerNot enough information to make a proper judgment. |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
C>C Personal answerDecrease only unnecessary and wasteful spending. |
Science › Nuclear Energy
C>C Personal answerYes, gradually with heavy regulation while we also invest in research into better nuclear (thorium, fusion) and renewable; solar, wind, geothermal, wave. |
the Environment › Animal Testing
C>C Personal answerNo |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
C>C Personal answerNo, but life in prison depending on the drug |
Foreign Policy › Torture
C>C Personal answerNo, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
C>C Personal answerLet the voters decide, but they most disclose the crime to the people. Have faith in the people to forgive if they want. If they served their time, and have no intentions of repeating or committing any other crimes then let them try. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
C>C Personal answerForeign aid should only be provided to those countries with bona fide humanitarian issues (ex. disaster relief and widespread hunger/disease) |
Healthcare › VA Privatization
C>C Personal answerNot informed enough to vote |
Foreign Policy › Drones
C>C Personal answerNo, only if a high target is hiding in their country and killed by either quietly or elite group on the ground for the fast-paced event. Other than that, congressional war is needed first. |
Science › GMO Labels
C>C Personal answerYes |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
C>C Personal answerIt depends on what there crime was that got them in prison. But they should still do community service and have a parole officer |
Education › Universal Pre-K
C>C Personal answerit should be the parents decision to send their child to preschool. |
Transportation › Public Transportation
C>C Personal answerYes, but only if it will benefit the economy in the long run. |
the Economy › Estate Tax
C>C Personal answerYes and we should eliminate it. The dead already paid their taxes on what they owned. The person inheriting it shouldn't be penalized for it. Only things that have not been taxed already should be taxed but not that high of a percentage. |
Education › Charter Schools
C>C Personal answerCharter schools are great; however, they are not accessible to all students and, therefore, I don't agree with pulling money from mainstream public schools to fund them. We should focus on turning all public schools into "charter" schools and on increasing teacher salaries in order to help achieve this goal. |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
C>C Personal answerNot well informed on the topic. Not sure why you want dual citizenship unless you travel frequently between the two for work and want to make sure you have rights so that you are not treated badly. If allow then, only two and only if you live in both places equally. |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
C>C Personal answerYes, though I do not think we need to ban them (not completely banned, just very limited and start the percentage lower and increase it gradually), but more importantly increase recycling so that way more people can recycle more often (also increase taxes on companies that make products that contain less than 50% of biodegradable materials to incentive them to make biodegradable products, try to replace most of—if not all—plastic with more biodegradable material) and increase consumer incentives to recycle these products |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
C>C Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
National Security › Military Congressional Approval
C>C Personal answerIt depends on the situation. If it is an emergency situation, then yes the president should not have to authorize with congress but if there is enough time, then congress should authorize. It all depends on the circumstances at the moment in time. |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
C>C Personal answerThey should be treated like humans. But have limited rights as they are not us citizens |
the Environment › Paris Climate Agreement
C>C Personal answerNot educated enough to understand what this really is. |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
C>C Personal answerNo, but taxation and legislation loopholes should be eradicated. |
National Security › Foreign Assassination
C>C Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country |
Science › Space Exploration
C>C Personal answerYes, but we need to decrease the federal deficit and solve several domestic problems first. In the meantime, space travel should be left to private companies, under government regulation. |
Foreign Policy › NATO
C>C Personal answerYes. However, NATO needs to be redefined to assure that every NATO partner is participating in an equitable manner. |
the Economy › China Tariffs
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
the Economy › NAFTA
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
C>C Personal answerNo, but there should be regulations and there should be a ban on accounts/posts not explicitly tagged as Political, Bias, or Advertising. It should be clear to every user that it is an opinion/advertisement. |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
C>C Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
Foreign Policy › India Arms
C>C Personal answerNo, it will likely be an ineffective strategy and could create an even larger arms race. The United States should either stand its ground or stay out of it. There is no real middle ground. |
Domestic Policy › Edward Snowden
C>C Personal answerMr. Snowden should face some consequences for violating the conditions of his security clearance but the merits of his claims should be investigated fully to ensure that there is no wrong doing by the NSA. If the NSA is found to have been performing illegal surveillances then Mr. Snowden should be exonerated. |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
C>C Personal answerYes, but only with the permission of the ally in question so long as they can do the same with us, and only target individuals or organisations with suspected ties to terrorists/subversive movements. |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
C>C Personal answerYes but if they violate any terms or are suspected or harbouring terrorists, the embargo goes back into place |
Foreign Policy › Jerusalem
C>C Personal answerNo, we shouldn't have the right to declare a capital in a foreign country. |
Education › School Truancy
C>C Personal answerThis question really depends on the situation of the family and should be delt with individually case by case |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
C>C Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › F-35
C>C Personal answerNot unless needed. |
Domestic Policy › Air Force One
C>C Personal answerYes, after a cost analysis that reveals it is less costly to produce new planes than maintaining the old planes. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.